Response: We have been disappointed but i have perhaps not managed to fully understand this remark. When you look at the contours 276-277, i fret a robust searching for according to prior books: there are variations in mating direction centered on sexual direction. As well, whilst appeared in the first entry regarding the breakdown from the fresh sociodemographic means put (today, inside the p. eight, traces 178-180), i’ve inquired about sexual direction as well 
as other responses received (heterosexual, gay, bisexual, other; perhaps not “not completely heterosexual”). We feel that sexual direction could have been because of the value it deserves: their pros might have been warranted regarding the introduction, the outcome in accordance with they was in fact commented in brand new dialogue, and also started accepted about restrictions of your data that collection heterosexuals/sexual minorities together with her form a loss in wealth and you can information on the specific means homosexuals and you will bisexuals perform.
It means: The very minimal category of more youthful, discovering, hetero- or non-heterosexual anyone isn’t simple to getting general beyond in itself also it never answer all the questions concerning the enough time-label positioning variations of society and not respond to it from inside the in itself.
Response: Once again, i’ve had difficulties to completely comprehend the comment. Using various addition/difference criteria try really-rationalized about manuscript. Each one of these factors (but the fresh non-identification of people, that is currently explained on the section Players) try discussed regarding limits of your analysis, acknowledging that attributes of the shot and of brand new addition/exception to this rule standards can impact the fresh generalization of efficiency. We never attempted to expose all of our decide to try because member regarding standard people, therefore we do not fully understand what is the point here.
Response: We have been sorry however, i also have had troubles to totally appreciate this opinion. For this reason, we do not make change in brand new manuscript out of this matter.
Seem to, anyone who “signed on the no less than one of one’s about three very used dating software inside Germany over the last 1 year” (p
Next: The restricted age period is pretty a beneficial categorical than an excellent metric adjustable hence overemphasizing possible results of ages.
Thus, once more, the relationship condition whenever research was indeed accumulated could possibly get or possibly no different on the standing in the earlier in the day one year
Response: Of a statistical viewpoint, we really do not understand what the latest customer is attempting to suggest here. Age, yet, try a changeable illustrated in a ratio measure, which have 9 different alternatives, off 18, 19, 20. so you can twenty six. What is actually clear is the fact that difference between 18 and you may 19 age is exactly the real difference regarding 25 to help you twenty-six years. Which equality away from distance ranging from surrounding ratings isn’t a property off categorical parameters, therefore we dont concur with the reviewer’s concern.
People in a love are usually typical dating app users (Freyth & Batinic, 2021; Hobbs mais aussi al, 2017; Le), relation Grindr this is exactly believed so you can, as more matchmaking are thought to be discover. Freyth & Batinic further could not see a difference of your relationship position from having fun with rather than-playing with relationship apps, and also no difference between genuine relationship app having fun with conclusion.
Response: Thanks a lot definitely for your comment. We are being unsure of about what the fresh reviewer needs me to modify because of the considering this opinion.
– Le). Since the Lefebvre implies the way in which exactly how she reviewed relationships condition is actually maybe not indicative off relationships status while using Tinder: “participants characterized the most recent relationship updates (may/may not reflect the standing while using the Tinder)” (p. 1211).
– Freyth and Batinic (2021). It is uncertain for us hence time frame these authors made use of to consider one dating programs user. 3), although it is actually unclear if it describes only tracked professionals or to every players.
